Um, I know “Feminist” is a dirty word, but I am gonna have to go ahead and come out of the closet.
I’m a Feminist… and “Studies” like this make my Feminist cup runneth over with frustration:
Childhood obesity in the United States has more than tripled in the past three decades, and prior research has linked maternal employment to children’s body mass index (BMI), a measure of their weight-for-height. A new study by an American University professor in the January/February issue of the journal Child Development has found that children’s BMI rose the more years their mothers worked over their children’s lifetimes.
Taryn W. Morrissey, assistant professor in public administration and policy, led the study with colleagues from Cornell University and the University of Chicago. The researchers used longitudinal information from the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, which was sponsored by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). They looked at 990 children in grades 3, 5, and 6 who lived in 10 cities across the country.
The researchers found that the total number of years mothers were employed had a small but cumulative influence on their children’s BMI, which, over time, can lead to an increase in the likelihood of overweight or obesity. The findings were strongest among children in 5th and 6th grades. Surprisingly, changes in children’s physical activity, time spent unsupervised, and time spent watching TV didn’t explain the link between maternal employment and children’s BMI. Moreover, the time of day moms worked wasn’t significantly associated with children’s BMI.
The reasons for these findings are not entirely clear. According to the authors, one possibility is that working parents have limited time for grocery shopping and food preparation. This may contribute to a greater reliance on eating out or eating prepared foods, which tend to be high in fat and calories.
Given that more than 70 percent of U.S. mothers with young children work, the importance of providing support to these families is clear. Based on their findings, the researchers call for efforts to expand the availability of affordable, readily accessible healthy foods, and to support and educate working parents about strategies for providing nutritious meals despite busy schedules.
“About a fifth of American children are considered obese, and childhood obesity has been associated with health, behavior, and academic problems in adolescence and adulthood,” according to Morrissey.
“Community- and school-based programs offer promise for promoting healthy weight by providing information to children and their families about nutrition and exercise, as well as how to make quick, healthy meals.”
Now, let me be frank. I grew up a latch-key child for a considerable part of my childhood. Might that’ve had something to do with my gaining weight? Of course. That’s not what I’m annoyed by.
I’m annoyed by the fact that this study makes no mention of Fathers… or male guardians at all, even. Any guardian other than the Mother. I mean, don’t get me wrong. If a University tried to study the “father” in my home, they would’ve come up short. I’m a single parent. But now, all of a sudden, women like me (or women who are simply
Does the study control for whether or not overall parental involvement – in general – makes a difference in a child’s propensity to gain weight? Or did they only study Moms? Why put the entire responsibility on the Mother? The hell are we supposed to do?
I’d stand to believe that the more available a guardian is in the home, the more opportunity they have to prepare food – as mentioned in the study’s press release – but why only mention the mother? Why not refer to the guardian? Or anyone else?
I mean, of course – any parents who are working “too much” are going to feel as if they have less time to cook for their children. I get that. But why put all of this on the Mother? What about the Father? What about this? What about that? For crying out loud, who’s got the study?